Our award-winning editorial board just this week received a response to a recent editorial. Unfortunately, because the writer did not provide a name, it can’t be printed in our newspaper. So I provide it here:
Thank you for your May 23rd article on “Tearing Down Our History.”
We all know change is inevitable and that some is beneficial and some is detrimental. It would seem that it would behoover us to carefully examine change initiatives and if we determine that we are note resisting change because we are just reactionary, we should try to deter detrimental change.
Our community does have something unique. People across the state and nation realize this. We know it is not just because of money. Our community has much of a small-town atmosphere despite being in the middle of one of the larger urban areas. People know one another. People are centered on family and schools. The list goes on and on.
The new “big box,” “nuevo rich” mentality that is sweeping the nation is and will have an impact on our community. We look more and more like Plano or Frisco every day — not that there is anything wrong with these cities but it is not the same “personality” as the Park Cities.
The people who are coming to the community to build these new structures seem to want to take advantage of what we and those who came before us have established but do not seem to recognize that they are changing what makes the community unique.
There are numerous issues. One that does not seem to have been mentioned is the alley entrances utilized by many of the new structures. Our alley is a single lane but many people are now using it as a street. Do our alleys have to be made one way? Will the alleys have to be resurfaced more frequently because of the traffic? Because most of the new construction does not want to waste any land on a driveway and the alley entrances are inconvenient for quick in and outs, people often park in the street as do their visitors. Many of our streets are down to a single lane because there are cars parked on each side of the street. Virtually every block seems to have construction going on and that adds even more vehicles. The safety issue of children crossing the street to play with other neighborhood children is also of concern.
The rear entrances and the high fences are similar to the bedroom communitites where people are said not to have met their neighbors.
Most of the new construction is “over building” the lots. The lack of lawn area should concern us. The privacy issues you mentioned should concern us. The drainage issues should concern us. Many of these houses should be built on acreage and not in a residential setting.
Your analogy to the recent rash of problems at NorthPark should give us pause. Bigger is not necessarily better. Zoning ordinances meant to protect the community should be completely revisited. Please continue to bring this to the attention of the community.
Alibaster is alive, well (?), and writing letters to the editor.
Tell me about it. I have lived in a construction zone for nearly 10 years as cottages are torn down and McMansions are installed all around me. True, my 1941 2 story was gutted and expanded in 1998 - but to 3700 square feet with a detached garage (no alley access) and plenty of lawn. I even removed 30 feet of “privacy” fence.
5 more years of the fabulous HP school system and I am free to be out of here.
And no, I’m not going to Frisco where all the houses are new and there isn’t much construction in existing neighborhoods as there is in UP, but to Wyoming. Yes, that Wyoming.
Why anyone would live in the Park Cities if they did not have children in the HP school system is beyond me.
Eric, let me enlighten you. I’m a single gal who has lived in my 1937 cottage since 1985. When I moved in, the mcMansion syndrome had not yet crossed west of Preston. But I have 2 very good reasons to stick it out:
1) I want to piss off the “bigger is better” bourgeois mentality, by refusing to give in. It is my personal responsibility to add some diversity to the Park Cities. I have been carefully restoring my bungalow for the last 2 years and am hoping it (the house) will serve as an excellent and creative example of an alternative lifestyle.
2) I feel safer here than I would in other parts of the metroplex, even though I am a bit different than the typical Park Cities household. I don’t have a husband, nor do I have 1.5 children.
Gadfly, I think the median in the Park Cities is 3 children. ijs
UPMom, does that average include all households in the Park Cities? Or is it just the family households? Well anyway, it is much better to have a whole child, rather than a half of one. Especially here.
To each his, er, her own.
First, I feel no such responsibility as you. Quite frankly I couldn’t care less about the bourgeois (and I would argue that these homes are the province of the noveau riche, not the bourgeois).
Second, I have lots of guns and know how to use them. Expertly. I would urge you to familiarize yourself with firearms with the help of a shooting instructor.
Third, as you have no children, when you shrug off this mortal coil a developer will scrape your lovely bungalow from this earth and erect a McMansion.
The Park Cities have not been a park for me. Though I have had friends here since the seventies, I bought my first house here in 1988 - a little 1947 ranch that still stands on Fondren. I left the state for a number of years returning 10 years ago so that - it turns out - my children could have a decent education.
It’s a nice thought that we have “our own” fire and police departments. It’s a nicer thought that I don’t have to rely on them.
The construction, the traffic, the tradesmen, the dogs on 50 foot leashes peeing on my roses, the crime - I’ve had enough. Much of what I read on this blog is also disheartening though it is defended as “tongue and cheek”.
Yump. 5 more years and - Wyoming. A section (um that’s a square mile, 640 acres for you city folks) of land and a lot of little signs saying “here, if your dog is found peeing on my roses it will be shot and converted to rose food”
Geez, Eric. I think you need a vacation. It might be best for everyone if you went alone.
As for Gadfly’s house, her lovingly renovated home will probably find a buyer who appreciates its old world charm and wants a smaller home. There is a market for such homes, especially if there in good shape.
Eric - can we help you pack? I would hate for you to suffer for 5 more years and there surely are some good schools in Wyoming.
When one lives in a major metropolitan city there will be traffic, tradesmen, construction and dogs. Thank goodness for the dogs.
You must be hanging out with the wrong people.
Thanks UPMom and maggie73. The gun thing really creeped me out. So I wasn’t planning on responding. Poor Eric. He has yet to discover that wherever he goes, life will follow.
Sure ! Need all the help I can get as there is no easy way to move. Let me know where to call in 4.9 years.